We automate the analysis of survey data from drone imagery, LiDAR point clouds, terrestrial laser scans, and mobile mapping.
AI-powered workflows handle quality assurance, classification, feature detection, volume calculation, change detection, and as-built vs. as-planned comparison. The result is consistent, verifiable CAD/GIS outputs — e.g., DXF, SHP, LAS/LAZ, GeoTIFF, and IFC — for documentation, planning, and BIM integration.

In modern surveying projects, data capture is largely automated, but post-processing remains complex. Drones, laser scanners, and mobile mapping systems generate large volumes of data that must be manually checked, cleaned, and structured.
Typical bottlenecks are point cloud classification, error-prone volume calculations, inconsistent layer structures, and missing version control. Our AI modules automate these analysis steps, transparently flag uncertainties, and deliver results in the required formats: DXF, SHP, LAS/LAZ, GeoTIFF, and standardized delivery packages.
Before data is processed further, the AI checks its suitability for the intended purpose. Typical quality issues often arise in the field: blurred or skewed image strips, underexposure or overexposure, insufficient GCP distribution, RTK failures, as well as occluded areas or abrupt changes in elevation.
This identifies faulty datasets early, before compute time, manual rework, or repeat field operations are required.
Numerical overall assessment of the dataset
Critical areas visually marked
Clear decision basis before processing
The AI recognizes content through the combination of semantic segmentation and multi-class classification. Depending on the data basis, it works either point-based on LiDAR point clouds and LAS/LAZ data or pixel-based on orthophotos and raster products. In many cases, 2D segmentation, 3D networks, and a fusion of orthophoto and elevation model from DSM/DTM are combined to separate classes more robustly.
Ground/non-ground separation for reliable DTM/DEM models and volume analyses
Detection of low, medium, and high vegetation for undergrowth, canopy, and understory
Building edges, roof surfaces, facades, and structural features are reliably classified
Asphalt, concrete, paving, and gravel areas are separated from non-impervious areas
Vehicles, containers, machinery, and other changing objects are recognized as a separate class
Material storage, excavation, and spoil areas with changing shape and height
Flowing and standing water, ditches, and water-bearing areas with specific surface structure
Paths, roads, tracks, lines, masts, and technical installations in the existing asset base
A key added value lies in the automated derivation of CAD- and GIS-ready features from point clouds, DSM/DTM, and orthobased elevation models. The AI detects edge contours, evaluates normal vectors, and segments surfaces by slope, curvature, and surface structure. This turns unstructured data into reliable CAD objects.
3D polylines, breaklines, and surface geometries with layer structure, attribution, and coordinate reference; directly usable in Civil 3D, AutoCAD, or BricsCAD
GIS-ready with feature type, elevation, slope, source, segment ID, and reliability, plus clean georeferencing
Hotspots, inspection areas, and uncertainties with a reliability heatmap for targeted post-processing
For construction, landfills, quarries, recycling, and earthworks, we automate the calculation of quantities and changes. This makes volumes faster, repeatable, and cleanly documentable - with versioning, parameterization, and reproducible evaluation.
Automatic detection of stockpiles, material islands, and material surfaces with base areas from point clouds, DSM/DTM, or orthodata. Overlaps are separated using surface curvature, elevation contrasts, gradients, and connectivity.
Volume in m³ using the prismatic method or TIN-based volume calculation; comparison of reference plane and base surface for cut/fill, stockpile volume, or inventory quantities. Both methods deliver locally exact, traceable results.
Quantity comparison across multiple points in time with DoD (DEM of Difference). Raster and surface models are differentiated and protected against noise, outliers, and minor changes using threshold filtering.
Volume report, base area layer, and quantities per area or material area with versioned input datasets, calculation parameters, and reference geometries. The terrain model used, base surface, thresholds, uncertainties, and calculation path remain audit-proofly documented.
With repeated measurements, the AI detects changes between two or more points in time. It combines geometric differences with semantic classification and thus delivers not only a difference map, but also a domain-specific statement: what has changed, where it happened, and whether it is relevant.
The DoD approach (DEM of Difference) is the core of the analysis: epochs are co-registered, then differentiated epoch by epoch. A threshold filter separates significant changes from noise and artifacts; uncertainty estimation takes into account point density, GSD, local roughness, interpolation errors, and registration residuals.
The semantic component focuses on domain-relevant classes such as “stockpile” or “ground”. Vehicles, machinery, vegetation, or temporary disturbances can be excluded or treated separately depending on the use case.
With more than two epochs, the before-and-after comparison becomes time series analysis. This makes it possible to monitor trend directions, rates of change, stability phases, recurring patterns, and step changes over longer periods.
Spatial visualization of significant changes after DoD, threshold filtering, and class filtering
Structured output by area with volume, area, height, and relevance metrics per epoch
Optional integration into Procore, ACC, Jira, or other systems with history, comments, and traceability
We compare surveying data with design data and output deviations in a structured way. Tolerance rules by trade, area, or component create clear decision-making foundations for acceptance and construction processes.
Tolerance rule logic: Each measurement is checked against a rule-based threshold matrix. Example: ±20 mm for concrete surfaces, fair-faced concrete, or precise installed components; ±50 mm for earthworks, subgrade, or non-finish structural surfaces. The rules can differ by component type, execution phase, zone, measurement resolution, or material class. If the permissible deviation is exceeded, the system generates a notification with severity and a reference to the affected rule.
Deviation notifications: For each detected difference, the measured value, position in the coordinate system, affected geometry, normalized deviation direction, confidence/reliability, and trade assignment are automatically recorded. This allows notifications to be passed directly to QA/QC, site management, or defect processes and linked with inspection reports, tasks, or BIM objects.
Our AI solution does not replace existing tools, but instead complements surveying, CAD, GIS, and BIM processes as an AI layer. It automates analyses, checks, classifications, and handoffs — vendor-independent and without media breaks.
The integration architecture supports REST APIs for requests, webhooks for events, batch processing for large data volumes, as well as cloud-native deployments in hybrid or fully cloud-based environments.
JPG, DNG, TIFF with EXIF/XMP; for photogrammetry, georeferencing, and feature detection
RTK/PPK logs, fix data, accuracy values, and timestamps for quality and position referencing
LAS/LAZ, GeoTIFF, DSM, DTM, DGM, DOM as well as raster and surface models for 2.5D and 3D analyses
IFC, DWG, DXF, and model information for as-built comparison, component references, and attribute checking
SHP, GeoJSON, GeoPackage, and layer structures for spatial analyses and domain data integration
3D polylines, breaklines, and feature layers for downstream CAD processes
GIS-ready vector data with attributes and spatial structure for QGIS and ArcGIS
Classified raster and point cloud data for specialized applications and analyses
PDF, CSV, QA heatmaps, and handoffs to Procore, ACC, and Jira
Platform and interface integration: Pix4D, Metashape, Civil 3D, BricsCAD, QGIS, ArcGIS, Procore, ACC, and Jira are connected via API, webhooks, file exchange, object IDs, and structured exports.
Architecture principle: Incoming data is normalized, validated, and transferred into a common analysis context. The AI layer then generates measurements, deviations, classes, issues, and transfer files — centrally, reproducibly, and at scale.
We do not replace surveying engineers, civil engineers, or specialist reviewers. The AI handles preprocessing, pattern recognition, prioritization, and preliminary review — including data normalization, object/feature recognition, plausibility checks, deviation detection, volume and area calculations, and reproducible audit logs. Technical assessment, correction, approval, and liability remain with the expert.
Automatic normalization, georeferencing, feature extraction, classification, measurement derivation, and initial plausibility checks.
Each result receives a confidence score based on model strength, data quality, and consistency checks; low scores or missing metadata move into manual review.
Deviations, threshold violations, highly variable volume calculations, and weak classifications are prioritized in QA heatmaps, review clusters, and review queues.
The specialist confirms or corrects results, reviews deviations and volume calculations, and assigns approval, version, and review notes.
Customer data remains within the agreed operating environment and is not used for external training purposes. Models, training data, parameters, configurations, prompts, outputs, and audit logs are versioned, documented in an audit-proof manner, and controlled through defined approval and rollback mechanisms. We deliver the complete technical operating foundation — from public cloud to isolated on-premise environments.
We turn surveying data into not a black box, but a traceable, integrated, and acceptance-ready technical process chain. All results are documented, versioned, and directly integrable into existing workflows.
Breaklines for TIN models with defined accuracy classes for as-built, planning, and billing purposes. Included are slope edges, ramps, excavation boundaries, terrain breaks, and plateaus as DXF for direct use in TIN models and surface models.
Base areas, volume in m³, and cut/fill analyses based on surface comparisons, TIN-to-TIN, or raster-to-raster approaches. Output includes method, reference date, area boundaries, balance values, and an uncertainty indication.
Semantically classified LAS/LAZ files according to the ASPRS standard, e.g. ground, vegetation, buildings, water, and special classes. The data is cleaned, de-spiked, and prepared with class codes, return information, and optional intensity values.
DXF, SHP, and GeoPackage according to the customer template, directly importable into target systems. The layers include attribute structures with object type, status, source, timestamp, as well as coordinate system, elevation reference, and transformation parameters.
QA reports, reliability heat maps, and inspection areas for rechecking. Included are confidence values, outlier markers, density and coverage indicators, and clearly defined inspection segments.
Standardized data package with technical documentation, processing parameters, and a complete audit trail. The documentation includes file list, file types, version status, creation time, coordinate system, processing steps, and test results.
Talk to us about your surveying data, existing systems, and recurring analysis steps. We’ll show where AI-powered automation is technically sensible and economically effective.

Tailored AI solutions for businesses — from strategic consulting to successful implementation.
© 2026 Jaroona. All rights reserved.
AI for Surveying & Geodata